Energizing voters
Fuel use and global warming heat up as campaign issues
Fuel use and global warming heat up as campaign issues
The Post and Courier
John Minavdo keeps a close eye on the mix of poultry grease and methanol that creates biodiesel at the Southeast Biodiesel in North Charleston Wednesday.
The Post and Courier
A bottle of bio diesel that Southeast Bio Diesel produces at it North Charleston plant.
Candidates' views
The issue of energy and global warming have been among the hottest topics in the presidential campaign, and most candidates have offered detailed ideas about what steps the nation should take next.
Democrats are being more sharply critical of what they see as President Bush's lack of significant action on the problems, although some also acknowledge the United States can't solve the problems without the cooperation of other large industrializing nations, such as China and India.
Republicans might differ in their views on what should be done about climate change, but all have talked of the need for reducing our dependence on foreign oil, if for no other reason than because the regimes of several oil-producing states are hostile to America.
With so many in the race, space doesn't permit a summary of all of their positions, but more information (as well as additional links) read the Presidential Candidates' views.
As the 2008 presidential primaries get closer, The Post and Courier is taking a close look at some of the biggest issues as seen through the eyes of Lowcountry residents. This installment looks at energy and the environment.
As presidential candidates talk about reducing our dependence on foreign oil, Dean Schmelter of Mount Pleasant has been turning chicken fat into diesel fuel for three months.
The idea took shape a few years ago, after Hurricane Katrina wrecked the Gulf Coast's oil refineries and caused everyone to pay more at the pump.
"I complained about gas prices after Katrina, and my mechanic said, 'Why don't you do something about it? You're a chemist,'" Schmelter said.
He is now a partner in Southeast BioDiesel, an industrial startup at the northern tip of the old Charleston Naval Base that was made possible largely by federal tax credits.
"The actual cost of the chicken oil and the processing is more expensive than diesel, but after taxes, it's a little cheaper," he said. Currently, it's about 10 cents a gallon cheaper.
Schmelter uses the brew to power his diesel Mercedes, as do about half of the plant's eight employees. The brew produces 78 percent less carbon dioxide — a gas emission many link to global warming.
While some Lowcountry shrimp boats use his fuel, the company exports much of it beyond the immediate region, which makes it less economical. He is looking for local customers.
He's also looking for assurance that the government won't change the playing field in a way that ruins his business plan. He's planning to add a second shift at the North Charleston plant that would double its capacity and soon might build a new plant next door or in Florida. There's a large stock of beef tallow, chicken oil and pork fat that could be turned into fuel — much of it now is used for dog food — and algae or other plants hold promise too.
He said he wants the next president to not only help ensure the tax structure makes this alternative fuel economical but also to consider converting the federal fleet to biodiesel. He doesn't see it as a partisan issue, adding, "I think everyone agrees we need to do something."
"The various politicians, to one degree or another, all say they're for alternative fuels," he added. "The truth always comes out after they're elected."
An oilman's view
A small office above a King Street shoe repair shop is not where one would typically find an oilman, but Rusty Bennett yearned to return to the Southeast after learning the business in Dallas.
A large county-by-county map of Texas hangs behind the desk where Bennett uses e-mails, faxes and phone calls to make deals for those looking to sell their oil and natural gas rights.
But the 26-year-old CEO of Black Mountain Royalty would be happy to see oil get some new competitors. In his ideal world, the price of oil would remain flat, making it easier for him to calculate deals.
"All alternative sources are now 1 or 2 percent," he said. "If that grows a few percentage points, I think that's good for the country. Maybe it's because I'm a younger guy, but I'm wholesale behind all those forms of supply."
He said he is leaning Republican in this election, partly because he is concerned about new windfall taxes on the oil industry — taxes he fears could put a damper on domestic production and hurt small businesses and property owners. "Democrats tend to view big oil as guys getting fat smoking cigars and making money off people going to work every day. I can't get as behind on that as other people do," he said.
Other oil competitors, such as coal or nuclear power, also carry their own environmental drawbacks, he said.
While he knows that oil and natural gas remain king because they're the cheapest, he also realizes that the world's long love affair with fossil fuels could be presenting a significant downside that goes beyond business. Bennett noted the one- or two-foot snows that he played in while growing up in Kentucky have become increasingly rare there.
"I'd be the first to volunteer that everyone is in agreement, based on scientific evidence and natural evidence, that the earth has been warming," he said. "It's in the realm of possibility that humans are the primary reason behind global warming."
"I cut off the lights around the house a lot more than I used to," he said.
Sustainable thinking
Beth Huntley is working to cut off not just the lights, but all other unnecessary energy use around the Lowcountry.
While her background is in interior design, Huntley recently became chairwoman of the Sustainability Institute, a nonprofit that began eight years ago in North Charleston and now works across the region to make homes more energy efficient and sustainable.
It provides workshops and energy audits. Once it found a family whose electric bill had topped $600 a month and helped it make changes to bring that down under $100.
While the institute is interested in wider issues such as air quality, the fate of the Brazilian rain forest and the toxicity of paint and other household materials, its bread and butter is helping people save on their power bills.
"If you want to call the energy issue the 'low-hanging fruit,' it is in a way," she said. "We're very focused on that because we know that's a way to go in and educate people."
Huntley said rather than fret about global warming, she would rather people feel empowered. She said she isn't looking for the next president to create new mandates, tax changes or treaties, but simply to highlight the issue of energy and environment so others are encouraged to make change.
"My feeling is if we are going to make significant change, then all of us have to have ownership in this issue," she said. "People can change a little at a time. We as a society can't deal with change all at a time, but if you feed it to us a little bit at a time, we're open to it."
Huntley said she thinks former Vice President Al Gore might be able to do more good by continuing his current work rather than entering the race. She plans to support Democratic contender Hillary Rodham Clinton but said she doesn't want the issue seen as a partisan one.
"Just because you recycle doesn't mean you're jumping on any Republican or Democratic bandwagon, and it just makes good common sense," she said. "It's offensive, as far as I'm concerned, if anybody drags the environment out as 'their' issue.
"It's everybody's issue."
Hopeful or hopeless?
Cornelia Carrier was one of the South's first journalists to focus on the environment when she worked in New Orleans years ago, and though she retired and settled in Charleston, she's still following the story.
And for her, it's not a happy one.
"I kind of fluctuate between feeling totally hopeless and hopeful that somebody will come along and lead this nation in addressing global warming," she said. "Already, methane is bubbling out of the permafrost, and methane is a lot worse gas than CO2."
Carrier, who participated in a Charleston rally this summer designed to draw attention to the global warming issue, said Gore's movie, "An Inconvenient Truth," has raised some awareness, but many people still don't seem to understand the threat.
She said she was at a recent planning meeting in which people were asked what they thought of when they thought about the Lowcountry. Many mentioned history, architecture and plantations.
"I raised my hand and I said, 'I think of the land that will be under water because of global warming. People laughed like I had made some kind of joke," she said. "I think if anybody should take it seriously, it's coastal residents, but they don't seem to want to at all."
Carrier, who is past president of the Audubon Society and has lobbied state lawmakers about environmental issues, said she considers global warming the biggest issue in the race — bigger even than the Iraq war —though she considers them two sides of the same coin.
"I do think we went to war in Iraq about oil. I have no question at all that's why we went," she said.
Carrier said she tries not to turn on the air conditioning in her home and only does so to remove the humidity when it's most oppressive, and her hope is the next president will inspire the nation to cut back on its energy consumption, reduce our dependence on cars and take other environmentally friendly steps.
"I can see why a candidate in a primary wouldn't paint a catastrophic scenario, but I hope whoever wins the primary gets people engaged in the issue," she said. "We need to scale back our lifestyle."
'Don Quixote and Sisyphus'
Reid Wiseman remembers when his lifestyle was very much scaled back — because of World War II.
"I remember when I was a kid during the Second World War collecting bacon fat and taking it to the butcher and getting 7 cents a pound," he said. "I've been frugal for a long time."
Wiseman spent most of the following decades in academia. For the past 30 years, he has taught the College of Charleston's course on "Man and the Environment," a blend of science, economics, politics — even sex.
"It's really an eclectic course," he said, adding that his props include weights, a 1,000-watt light bulb and even an image of the Seven Dwarfs.
While the biology professor believes in global warming, his environmental concerns extend well beyond that topic.
"We're adding to the global population every four years a population equal to the population of the United States," he said. "If we keep on going, we'll have 13 billion people on our planet in 62 to 63 years. How are we going to supply energy to 13 billion people?"
Wiseman said the overarching issue is a sort of tragedy of the commons, how mankind's growth is taxing the earth in many ways.
While he recycled bacon grease, and still commutes from the Isle of Palms in his 1990 sedan with 245,000 miles on it, and tries to conserve in other ways, he knows he's not the perfect example of the change the needs to be made. He calculates he alone causes about 25,000 pounds of carbon dioxide to be released into the air each year.
"We're all guilty," he said. "It's been an uphill fight even to convince members of my own family to be frugal."
"I'm a combination of Don Quixote and Sisyphus," he said. "For some strange reason, I keep jousting at those windmills and pushing the boulder up the hill."
He said he does it for his two daughters, five grandchildren and others in the coming generation.
"Have you ever heard one of these presidential candidates even questioning the future demographics of the United States and the world?" he asked. "You know why they don't do it? I don't know if they know about it."
Reach Robert Behre at 937-5771 or at rbehre@postandcourier.com.



Comments
sjmehlhose (anonymous) says...
Global warming caused by human activity is an absolute fraud. If it were real, then Al Gore wouldn't have had to rely on lies and assumptions which are not based on fact. An eruption of a volcano in the Phillipines (Mt. Pinatubo in 1994) produced more "greenhouse gasses" than ALL human activity in the last 100 years, and it only affected the global temprature by less than a degree for less than 2 years. Scare tactics by these environmental wacko's is really getting old. There may be some warming, but it is simply the natural centuries long weather trends. Remember that in the 70's environmentalists were warning of a coming ice age. They have no idea what is going on.
October 21, 2007 at 1:39 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
DixieTiger (anonymous) says...
Al Gore and all of these other self-proclaimed "environmentalists" wrap themselves in the flag of global warming in order to scare people into agreeing with them. The fact that these people think we, as a species, have enough power to drastically alter the climate of the entire world is one of the most egotistical statments in history. They use images of retreating glaciers and talk about polar bears drowning to prove that global warming exists. What these "environmentalists" won't tell you is that global temperatures have fluctuated throughout history and will always fluctuate. Look at the historical records decide for yourself instead of listening to these sensationalists.
October 21, 2007 at 1:57 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
sheeple (anonymous) says...
I refuse to believe there's a crisis until the people telling me there is a crisis start ACTING like there is a crisis.
October 21, 2007 at 2:30 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
zebraprncs (anonymous) says...
Um, it's October 21 and we're all wearing shorts. Not sweaters, not long sleeves, shorts. All of our opinions do not matter. They don't. Just keep driving your big trucks and SUVs, and throwing away all your trash to be piled up on a big field somewhere, and how about go tear up some styrofoam and putting it in the microwave while you're at it. Pretty soon, you'll be able to get a suntan just walking to your car. So go ahead, say everyone's a liar, and that you don't believe. The facts won't go away. Regardless of whose right, and whose wrong, the facts are in front of us all.
October 21, 2007 at 2:35 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
sjmehlhose (anonymous) says...
zebraprncs:
You say that like it's a bad thing!!! :)
October 21, 2007 at 2:58 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
bkeelin (anonymous) says...
"Wearing shorts in Oct". Uh, it's the South.
October 21, 2007 at 4:22 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
sjmehlhose (anonymous) says...
zebraprncs must be one of those yankee transplants.
October 21, 2007 at 4:53 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
beespencer (anonymous) says...
hnmmm....i remember in 1988, Christmas Day temperature was near 80 degrees, and the next winter it snowed around Christmas. The weather goes in cycles. Everyone was predicting a bad hurricane season 2 years in a row.
October 21, 2007 at 6:15 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BlueGrits (anonymous) says...
sjmehlhose and Dixietiger,
I have yet to see a large group of established scientists overwhelmingly bash Gore's film as inaccurate drivel. The fact that not one person in the White House will publicly admit to watching the film only furthers the splitting of the fight to save the planet between those who are admit the problem and try to do something and those who dismiss the global problem because they are too busy living in their own pathetic single-minded worlds.
If global warming is true and humanity is either causing or accelerating it, and our government has stuck its head in the sand on the issue, then people who want to take a realistic approach to national affairs would, of course, want political power, and who could blame them? You?
If global warming, etc. is not true, then why would you think that a big lie, easily refutable (much easier than, say, "Sadaam is an active threat to our homeland") would be subscribed to?
If global warming is true, but humankind's accelerating impact is not, then we go back to option one -- here's an impending disaster, and our government is refusing to do anything about it.
But I want to know...who has hired all these scientists? Vague "lefties?" How very Orwellian. Blame Snowball.
You think the politics of these scientists drive their scientific conclusions, but perhaps it is the other way around.
And perhaps they are honest, rigorous scientists, striving to use scientific method to explain what's going on in the physical world. perhaps they don't subordinate scientific observation to faith-based hopes?
October 21, 2007 at 9:35 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
sjmehlhose (anonymous) says...
BlueGrits:
What about all the scientists who testified in England where the courts ruled that Gores film was totally unsubatantiated and fraudulent??? I think that this is pretty conclusive. BTW, I think you meant substantiate, not subordinate.
October 21, 2007 at 9:41 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
sjmehlhose (anonymous) says...
These scientists make millions from government grants, and if they don't have a crisis to study, then their funding dries up. I think that this is enough motive to have their politics drive their conclusions.
October 21, 2007 at 9:44 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
awarechs (anonymous) says...
You know, zebraprncs, this is the kind of inane comment that those of us on the right just shake our heads at. It really affirms to us that you have no argument at all and it frankly mystifies us how anyone with even a toe-hold of an intelligence over 60 would make a comment like this IN DEFENSE OF THEIR POSITION! If you really had an argument that held a drop of water, you would assert it confidently and invite a constructive discourse.
There is of course the possibility that you're from Finland or something and have never been to Charleston before - if that's the case, here's a geography lesson: Charleston, geographically speaking, is practically in the Bahamas..those funny trees you see all around are called palm trees and the big nasty lizards you see on the golf courses are called alligators. so yeah, it's pretty "warm" here in October...EVERY YEAR. Sheesh.
October 21, 2007 at 9:59 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BlueGrits (anonymous) says...
sjmehlhose,
No, the word "subordinate" is correct. Read: as in not treating science secondary to faith based not bowing to faith-based nonsense.
I think the scientists you speak of are likely in the same circle of scientists who were paid for by ExxonMobile think tank American Enterprise Institute (AEI); the very group with close ties to the Bushies, who were offered payments, travel expenses and additional payments for articles that emphasise the shortcomings of a report from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC-- the group who shared the Nobel Prize with Al Gore.
And here's the kicker: AEI has received more than $1.6m from ExxonMobil and more than 20 of its staff have worked as consultants to the Bush administration. Where do you think the British scientists got their information from?
Letters sent by AEI, thats who. Fact: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)report have been an open secret since the Bush administration posted its draft copy on the internet in April. It says there is a 90% chance that human activity is warming the planet, and that global average temperatures will rise by another 1.5 to 5.8C this century, depending on emissions.
Lord Rees of Ludlow, the president of the Royal Society, Britain's most prestigious scientific institute, said: "The IPCC is the world's leading authority on climate change and its latest report will provide a comprehensive picture of the latest scientific understanding on the issue. It is expected to stress, more convincingly than ever before, that our planet is already warming due to human actions, and that 'business as usual' would lead to unacceptable risks, underscoring the urgent need for concerted international action to reduce the worst impacts of climate change. However, yet again, there will be a vocal minority with their own agendas who will try to suggest otherwise."
Ben Stewart of Greenpeace said: "The AEI is more than just a thinktank, it functions as the Bush administration's intellectual Cosa Nostra. They are White House surrogates in the last throes of their campaign of climate change denial. They lost on the science; they lost on the moral case for action. All they've got left is a suitcase full of cash."
Since that time, another Exxon-funded organisation based in Canada has pursued a review in London which casts doubt on the IPCC report. Among its authors are Tad Murty, a former scientist who believes human activity makes no contribution to global warming. Confirmed VIPs attending include Nigel Lawson and David Bellamy, who believes there is no link between burning fossil fuels and global warming.
http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news...
October 22, 2007 at 10:37 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.