Wind and tides cut away at Isle of Palms

'Inlet' islands take brunt as sea carries away sand

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, October 3, 2007


Waves crash against anti-erosion sandbags at Wild Dunes on Isle of Palms on Tuesday.

Grace Beahm
The Post and Courier

Waves crash against anti-erosion sandbags at Wild Dunes on Isle of Palms on Tuesday.

'Inlet' islands take brunt as sea carries away sand

ISLE OF PALMS — Waves smashed over the sandbags and into the pool at Seascape Condominiums. The ocean has ripped away half the 18th green at the Links course. Full-moon tides and high winds have played havoc at the Wild Dunes resort.

The tides on the east end of Isle of Palms have pushed into the dunes and onto walkways for about a two mile stretch. Erosion has been bad at the island's other end, from Breach Inlet to 3rd Avenue West, said Isle of Palms Mayor Mike Sottile on Tuesday. "It's the worst I've ever seen it, and I've been here on the island all of my life."

The Lowcountry has been caught in a wheelhouse of high and low pressure systems, whirling up stiff, steady winds of more than 20 mph, in the same direction as the tide runs. Lunar tides predicted to be unusually high came in a foot higher than expected.

"The winds have been blowing sustained out of the northeast for several days now. You put that on top of a really high, high tide and twice a day the beach is really getting pounded," said Bill Eiser, S.C. Ocean and Coastal Resources Management oceanographer.

Meteorologist Steve Taylor with the National Weather Service, Charleston, said the winds should drop and conditions improve from here on out.

The most vulnerable "inlet" islands, like Isle of Palms or Hunting Island in Beaufort County, have eroded severely. Other Lowcountry beaches are handling the pounding better.

Besides the Isle of Palms, Sullivan's Island has taken the worst beating. Breach Inlet has been battered, with surf washing under a few beachfront homes. The beach walkway at Station 30 nearby now has a 3-foot drop-off, said Fire Chief Anthony Stith. "We've lost a lot of sand dunes. But basically we're in pretty good shape."

Folly Beach hasn't had the dunes breached, said Steve Robinson, public works director. Kiawah Island and Edisto Beach made it through without serious problems, town officials said.

Should more be done by local, state and federal government to save Wild Dunes from further erosion?

See the results without voting.

At Wild Dunes, an already bad erosion problem is reaching critical mass. The Links course has built a second, permanent green inland on the 18th hole, turning the signature par 5 hole into a par 3 for the foreseeable future, said Jeff Minton, golf director.

At Seascape, the tides have overrun a large sandbag wall and are gutting out the sand behind them. The fence has been pushed over at the beachside pool, one lightpost has fallen and two more are falling. The sand is gone under the oceanfront lip of the walk around the pool.

The sandbags are the touchpoint of a struggle against beach erosion by six oceanfront condominium complexes and the golf course at the gated resort community, the consequence of Hurricane Hugo damage and a few years of rough weather during a time of sand loss on the inlet beach, which periodically gains or loses sand.

The properties now are protected by a wall of sandbags, which are being shredded by the wash. State and federal regulators have said no more sand bags can be placed.

Meanwhile, golf course and property owners are struggling through regulations and legal challenges to renourish that beach, an effort now in its fifth year. They are negotiating with state regulators over an enforcement order that could include fines and mitigation demands because hundreds of thousands of bags have already washed away.

"I will say one thing, if we didn't have those big bags in front of those buildings they wouldn't have any protection at all," Sottile pointed out Tuesday.

Seascape property manager Lona Vest said it was a desperate situation.

"The sandbags, you don't even see them," she said, standing at poolside Tuesday as surf splashed her. "If you stood back here you wouldn't even know I had anything out there at all. Granted they're better than nothing. But what other options are there? We've asked that repeatedly. We know the erosion is cyclical. But it never went back this far. It's never lasted this long."

A consultant estimated this period of beach erosion could last another year to 18 months, Vest said; he projected the complex would last another 18 months. That was before this latest blast. Asked how long she thinks they have now, Vest paused and took a breath.

"I don't know," she said.

Reach Bo Petersen at 745-5852 or bpetersen@postandcourier.com.



Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version   Add this

Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  8 comment(s)

Posted by mac0cm4 on October 3, 2007 at 4:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Nature will always win despite the best efforts of man. Best bet is to sell your land if it is affected and move.



Posted by greener1 on October 3, 2007 at 10:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Taxpayers get ready. Those rich folk over there will soon be crying for help and $$$ even though their dumasses built houses near the ocean, AMAZING!



Posted by robert8096 on October 3, 2007 at 11:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

A good lesson on why NOT to build you million dollar house or condo on the beach. Let Mother nature have her land back and once the erosion turns and the sand comes back then make it a public area where everyone can enjoy it. Not just for the people who have more money than brains.



Posted by mjklow on October 3, 2007 at 11:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Greener1 you are sooo right. These people over there think they can have their cake and eat it too.



Posted by MHA on October 3, 2007 at 2:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Let me get this straight... the wind blows, the tides change and the sand gets moved? Wow.. This IS newsworthy.



Posted by BeachandLake on October 3, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Yes, something needs to be done to protect the dunes and the property. Ocean front folks pay 150% more taxes when they are not permanent residents. As an average, they pay $5000 more to Charleston County than the average homeowner.

Let these ocean front properties leave and you will be paying about $2000 more in property taxes each year. I certainly hope you enjoy paying more county taxes.

Right now the greatest tax burden is on absentee owners; then, it will be on your backs.



Posted by trod on October 4, 2007 at 12:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Yep something does need to be done to protect dunes and property like forbidding building there.it isn't any wiser than the people in new Orleans living below the sea level you knew when you bought it it was a probability that one day it could erode away a risky investment.actually u take 300$and multiply it by the 333917 residents in Charleston county and it covers up to 2000 front beach homes worth of taxes at 5000 each witch i doubt theres that many that are having that problem.it may cost the average home owner a 100$or 200$ at worst so actually your argument doesn't hold water neither does your investment.so sell it.or let mother nature take its course or pay to save your bad investment.



Posted by beespencer on October 4, 2007 at 1:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)

"Let these ocean front properties leave and you will be paying about $2000 more in property taxes each year. I certainly hope you enjoy paying more county taxes."

Posted by BeachandLake

Are you serious??? You want to entire county pay to protect beachfront property that 99% of the residents can't afford or able to enjoy? No one told you to build and live on the beach.