S.C. will lose GOP delegates
Holding primary before Feb. 5 to cost Palmetto State and 4 others at national convention
By Robert Behre
Holding primary before Feb. 5 to cost Palmetto State and 4 others at national convention
When Republican National Committee Chairman Mike Duncan visited Charleston in July during the Democratic presidential debate at The Citadel, he said Republican Party rules called for punishing states that held primaries before Feb. 5.
On Thursday, he did just that.
South Carolina, which will hold its GOP primary Jan. 19, is one of five states that will lose half of their delegates to September's national convention, Duncan said.
"No one wants to be in a position to penalize anyone, but our rules are self-enforcing," Duncan told reporters. "They give me no options."
The Republican National Committee voted 121-9 to impose the penalties. Duncan, who has final say over the matter, said he would go along.
The states "were made fully aware of what the consequences would be," he said.
The widely expected move also affects New Hampshire, Michigan, Wyoming and Florida.
The rule doesn't affect Iowa or Nevada because they are holding caucuses, not primaries. Those caucuses are set for Jan. 3 and Jan. 19, respectively.
When South Carolina moved up its primary, it took a calculated risk that someone would restore its delegates or that the influence of its earlier primary would far outweigh any loss of delegates.
If a clear GOP winner emerges from the primary process, few will notice how many delegates each state has. The eventual nominee also could restore them. But if the primary process doesn't produce a clear winner, then South Carolina's influence at the convention could be halved.
The Republican nominee for president will have to win a majority of the 2,380 delegates to the convention.
Under Duncan's action, Florida would lose 57 delegates, Michigan 30, South Carolina 23, Wyoming 14 and New Hampshire 12.
State GOP Chairman Katon Dawson has said if that's the case, the state party would consider legal action to restore its full slate of 47 delegates. Duncan has said he thinks the national party's penalty would hold up in court.
Other states are optimistic that the penalty will be rescinded. Florida GOP Chairman Jim Greer said in a statement. "This is a long process, and I continue to be confident that Florida will ultimately seat its full delegation. ... I look forward to continuing this dialogue in a respectful and cooperative manner."
Wyoming is set to hold nominating conventions Jan. 5, while Michigan Republicans will hold their primary vote Jan. 15, pending the outcome of a lawsuit. Florida Republicans are set to vote Jan. 29.
New Hampshire state law calls for its primary to be held at least seven days before any other.
New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner met a legal deadline this week that allows him to schedule the primary in early December if necessary. The state is required to start distributing absentee ballots bound for overseas 30 days before the election.
"We have met the 30 days," he said. "That leaves early December open."
Democratic rules allow four states to hold votes before Feb. 5: Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina. Republican rules, adopted at the 2004 national convention, do not allow any exceptions.
The Democratic Party has vowed to strip all the delegates from Florida for violating party rules by moving up its primary, but South Carolina Democrats have been working with the party to gain its approval to move their date from Jan. 29 to Jan. 26.
The Associated Press contributed to this report. Reach Robert Behre at 937-5771 or rbehre@postandcourier.com.
Comments
sjmehlhose (anonymous) says...
So much for a democratically elected republic. . .
This is just more proof that both the Republicans and Democrats are both corrupt (I usually support Republican candidates as being the lesser of two evils).
November 9, 2007 at 7:56 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
majorjohnson (anonymous) says...
Yeah we should be able to hold our primaries for the next election as soon as one is over! Lets move our primaries to November 31, 4 years before the next election.
This is ridiculous. Why would the parties risk losing half of their delegates by breaking the party rules just so we can have the distinction of holding our primaries a few days before someone else? This whole race to have the earliest primaries is about to result in the primaries being held in December, with absentee ballots cast in November! Why would you want to select your presidential nominee a year before the election is held and lose the time you could be deciding on best of the candidates for your party and possibly the country? I'm a libertarian, so I don't even really have a dog in this hunt, but it sure makes the democrat and republican state parties look like a bunch of children.
November 9, 2007 at 8:34 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Zod (anonymous) says...
I would rather see South Carolina receiving the cash from the "early in" primary race than have the distinguishment of delegate votes. Presidential elections are a farce anyway. George Bush or John Kerry was the best this country had to offer in 2004? Bush or Gore in 2000? This system is broken. I say we keep taking the cash......
November 9, 2007 at 9:32 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
afternoondelight (anonymous) says...
Come on S.C. GOP leaders!!!
Let's follow the rules and this wouldn't happen.
November 9, 2007 at 9:41 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
gatekeeper (anonymous) says...
I do not live in the Charleston area but in the thick of primary country in NH. This will be my 7th presidential primary since moving here. The need to have early primaries has nothing to do with politics and being the first to voice their choice for a candidate. It is all about how much money the NH economy can get from the candidates visits and the press corp that follows them. I doubt the state cares at all about lost delegates as long as there is no economic impact from it.
November 9, 2007 at 9:44 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- S.C. losing port traffic to other states
- Out with old ...
- Water — 'The smell is gone'
- Cart gives Buddy new lease on life
- Schools plan to update visitor-security system
- GenPhar site 'red-tagged'
- Man, 17, killed in motorcycle wreck
- Off campus
- Historic manor house used by Girl Scouts is among buildings that might be torn down to make way for future
- New drug may hold promise for lupus sufferers
