Climate dialogue starts under a new light
By David Slade
A committee formed by Gov. Mark Sanford to address climate change took a small step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions Wednesday, when members accepted compact fluorescent light bulbs from Progress Energy Vice President Emerson Gower.
The task of crafting statewide policies on climate change won't be as easy as changing a light bulb, but the token gift from committee member Gower highlighted the role conservation could play.
Utility company executives, environmentalists, lawmakers and others appointed by Sanford to the 30-member South Carolina Climate, Energy and Commerce Advisory Committee are sorting through a huge list of possible policies and programs.
Ideas range from enforcing speed limits to fundamentally changing the way energy is produced and consumed.
The committee has until next summer to sort out its findings.
Sanford announced the creation of the committee in February.
Scientists believe South Carolina is facing rising sea levels, hotter summers and stronger storms because of climate change.
The widespread impacts could be particularly challenging for coastal communities, wildlife and the state's two largest industries, tourism and agriculture.
The Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, whose director Steve Smith is on the committee, released a video Wednesday intended to get people talking about the issue.
In the video, scenes of a church meeting on Edisto Island, a man fishing for trout in an Upstate stream, a golfer on Hilton Head, tourists in Charleston, and people playing at the beach roll by as announcers talk about what could be lost to climate change.
"I don't think destroying nature is Godly at all," Sen. Clementa Pinckney, D-Ridgeland and pastor of Mt. Horr AME church, say in the video.
Smith distributed copies of the video to the committee, but before the meeting he questioned the state's commitment to solutions.
"There is no way the state can say they are serious about global warming while building new coal plants," he said.
State-owned utility Santee Cooper is seeking permission to build an 835-megawatt coal-burning power plant in Florence County.
Opponents say energy conservation measures could eliminate the need for the plant and its 8.7 million annual tons of climate-warming carbon dioxide.
Santee Cooper says the plant is crucial to meeting increasing energy demands in South Carolina caused by this growth. The utility's president and CEO Lonnie Carter is also a committee member.
"We can only do so much to encourage people to conserve," Carter said.
Reach David Slade at 937-5552 or dslade@postandcourier.com.
Comments
SouthernAlliance (anonymous) says...
The film referenced above, "Treasured Places: South Carolina in Peril", can be viewed on Southern Alliance for Clean Energy's website at http://www.cleanenergy.org/programs/h....
June 28, 2007 at 9:31 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
lisagary (anonymous) says...
It's about time that such a dialogue begins, but where are the incentives for South Carolina residents to use solar power to run their homes? SC is one of a small minority states that doesn't have some degree of net metering. For example, California and New Jersey residents can get up to 70% of the cost of a home solar power system rebated to them in addition to generous net metering (which is when the electric company credits the homeowner when they generate more power than they use), plus all sorts of tax incentives for the long term. South Carolina gets MUCH more sun than New Jersey; why is the state government so far behind on this critically important issue?
Regarding the post about compact fluorescent bulbs, they do indeed need to be disposed of properly (any municipal recycling program can take them) and do cost more upfront, but they last 10 to 12 times longer than incandescents and when used throughout a home can significantly put a dent in the monthly electric bill.
Interested in learning more about South Carolina's struggle for net metering? Look here: http://icfsteel.com/netmetering/home....
June 28, 2007 at 4:16 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- Shared
- Charleston Place hotel says GOP group skipped out on tab
- Charleston Place sues Republican group
- State workers may have to wait longer to retire
- Deputy reaches 133 mph during pursuit
- OSHA: First job at scene of fire is paperwork
- Boeing admits defect in some 787s
- Setting North Charleston's police record straight
- High-Speed Pursuit Part 1
- Teacher pay raise tops wish list
- Local B&Bs share recipes for most inviting meal of the day



