Sand battle won't blow over

IOP man wins right to appeal permit

The Post and Courier
Tuesday, July 31, 2007


ISLE OF PALMS — The Wild Dunes sandbag fiasco just sank a little deeper. The S.C. Supreme Court on Monday ruled that an island resident has the right to appeal a state permit that allows moving sand from public to private areas.

That takes the five-year-old case that led to the mess back to the courts for hearing. With high tides lapping at the resort's eroded oceanfront golf course and six condominium complexes, it could be months or more before any other beach renourishment plan clears regulatory and legal hurdles.

The properties now are protected by a wall of sandbags, which are being shredded by tides.

Jim Smiley, who lives just outside the private resort's gate, appealed a state Office of Ocean and Coastal Resources Management permit that would have allowed the Wild Dunes Community Association to scrape sand from the beach each month to rebuild dunes for its beachfront property owners.

Smiley said recently he simply didn't want to see 25,000 cubic yards of sand per month scraped from the public beach a foot and a half deep to build dunes on private property. OCRM attorneys argued that as a resident Smiley had no "standing," no grounds to appeal. Smiley lost two earlier court rounds before the

Monday ruling.

"Thank goodness," said attorney Jimmy Chandler, whose South Carolina Environmental Law Project took over the case pro bono after Smiley lost earlier legal rounds.

"It basically keeps the courthouse door open for citizens who want to protect the public's interest. We're back at square one now."

Attorneys for OCRM would not comment because the case is still under litigation, said Thom Berry, spokesman for the S.C. Health and Environmental Control.

The ruling bolsters other residents who say they will appeal if the state issues a permit to dredge from Dewees Inlet at the tip of the resort. Beachfront resort property owners want to take sand from a spit that has formed near Cedar Creek, and property owners who use the spit as a beach are ready to sue to stop them.

The only other solution, dredging sand from offshore, has a rule-of-thumb cost of $1 million per mile for each year between renourishment projects.

Chandler couldn't say immediately what impact the ruling might have on the overall Wild Dunes situation.

He has been in ongoing meetings with OCRM and property officials. "I was always sure we would eventually prevail," Smiley said Monday by e-mail.

"Without this decision, citizens would have lost their ability to contest virtually all (state) permitting decisions."

Reach Bo Petersen at 745-5852 or bpetersen@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

singleroni (anonymous) says...

they know of the danger when they build there. Why should we pay the price but can not enjoy the view, location or even a walk on the private beaches. That is part of the price of living on the land near the cost. Public funds should not be used for private lands.

July 31, 2007 at 7:22 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

trm2105 (anonymous) says...

Wild Dunes residents, start learning to tread water! You bought the land, you bought the problem.

July 31, 2007 at 8:17 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

richturner76 (anonymous) says...

They should go back up north to the beaches up there!!

July 31, 2007 at 8:43 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

deputy216 (anonymous) says...

I guess this is like eating your cake and ice cream at the same time.You want to live in a private resort and let evbryone else pick up the tab.

July 31, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

cede (anonymous) says...

Wow! I've considered moving to the Charleston area for some time now -- but after reading the above comments, I see that there are many unhappy people there -- guess I'll take my positive attitude elsewhere!

July 31, 2007 at 11 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

sailman2 (anonymous) says...

No, most people in Charleston are pretty happy. Beach erosion and renourishment is an on-going issue and one that will not go away. Regarding Isle of Palms, it will probably get worse and the "noise" will get louder. The solution? Live on the mainland, since that will be beachfront in several decades.

July 31, 2007 at noon ( | suggest removal )

mac0cm4 (anonymous) says...

Mother Nature always wins the battle...this will prove true with all of our barrier islands.

July 31, 2007 at 1:18 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

trm2105 (anonymous) says...

Cede,

you're more than welcome to come. just don't make the same mistake these folks did. There's a lot of beautiful places in the lowcountry.

July 31, 2007 at 6:16 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

newbattleaxe (anonymous) says...

It's all going to come down to who has the deeper pockets - OCRM or the Wild Dunes. Fifty years down the road, where will the Wild Dunes folks get their sand? IF that end of the island still exists, that is.

July 31, 2007 at 7:58 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.