'No Child' passes progress tests

Monday, July 30, 2007


A new study showing that students are spending more time on reading and math since the 2002 enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act is good news. So is another recently released study showing a general rise in academic performance over the last five years. And another encouraging study has reconfirmed the toughness of South Carolina's academic standards as it strives to improve its public education system.

Unfortunately, though, National Education Association president Reg Weaver has again condemned NCLB, telling members of the organization at their annual meeting in Philadelphia, "The purpose of education is not to score well on a standardized test." And as columnist Debra Saunders warns on today's Commentary page, some Democrats in Congress appear intent on diluting NCLB's primary strength — its mandating of regular, accurate measurements of academic performance to ensure educational accountability.

That accountability already has paid off, judging from the results of an 18-month study by the nonpartisan Center on Education Policy that documents an increase in student achievement since 2002. Jack Hennings, a former Democratic congressional aide now serving as the center's president, pointed out that while local and state initiatives also played a significant role, NCLB "is clearly part of the mix of reforms whose fruit we are now seeing."

The researchers also reported that since NCLB, "the achievement gap" between white and black students has decreased. U.S. Education Secretary Margaret Spellings cited the study to argue: "We know the law is working, so now is the time to reauthorize."

Secretary Spellings also hailed the Center on Education Policy's findings in another study, released last week, about the intensified focus on reading and math. The secretary rightly rejected misplaced concerns that instruction in other courses has suffered as a result, telling The Associated Press: "If children can't read, they can't learn history. Before No Child Left Behind, little was done to hold schools accountable for teaching our children basic, critical skills."

South Carolina Superintendent of Education Jim Rex wasn't as enthusiastic about NCLB during a recent conference call from Columbia, giving it a grade of "C plus or B minus." But he added, "I sure wouldn't throw it out. I think the law has done some good things."

Dr. Rex also stressed that while he will ask the General Assembly to approve changes in the state's testing format next year, he has no intention of throwing out South Carolina's "exceptionally high" testing standards. That description was verified by National Center for Education Statistics research, released recently, ranking our state among the top five in that category.

Those high standards should be maintained. So should the regular, honest measurement of student achievement necessary for educational accountability.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

Teach4Kids12 (anonymous) says...

Maybe if we had some principals downtown that cared a little more about people and not so much about getting themselves to the top, then education would be better all around. Look at why good schools are good. Usually becasue they have strong leadership. And by strong I mean well rounded individuals that realize people are people and show their appreciation for them, not just through robotic statements in emails like "You are all wonderful, you do great things for our children". Don't give me that if you are going to turn around and ignore me for the rest of the day/week/month/year. Seriously, its a huge problem. There needs to be more accountability for the principal at the building level. Anyone can take data and fudge numbers and make a school meet AYP, which is what happens, especially in urban settings, but to truly have a staff that is happy, trusts the leader, follows the leader, and respects the leader, then you are going to meet all your goals anyway. Administrators need to stop looking at their staff as wrongdoers and people who are out to be lazy. Sometimes this is the case, but a majority of us love our jobs, but hate being at them because we are treated like students who are in summer school for being bad. This lowers the morale of the school and you know as well as I do, when you are not happy, then your work is not as good as it could be. Think about it. Thats what I think.

July 31, 2007 at 10:15 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.