Demand Barnwell answers

Thursday, August 30, 2007



Radioactive waste is inherently dangerous stuff, which is why the disposal site in Barnwell is carefully monitored for leaks that could contaminate groundwater. Why, then, haven't state environmental officials taken a more active role in sounding the alarm about excessive levels of tritium found extensively around the site?

That's a question Attorney General Henry McMaster is asking in view of the recent revelations about waste contamination there. Mr. McMaster also is trying to determine who is liable for the violations. Presumably, that will help determine who should be responsible for the necessary mitigation and site improvements.

The State newspaper reported that tritium levels exceeded federal safe drinking water standards in a third of the 98 monitoring wells. In some instances the levels were hundreds of times more than allowable, and greater than those monitored at the Savannah River Site.

Several members of the House Committee on Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs expressed surprise to learn of the contamination levels. Last legislative session, the committee considered a proposal to extend the site's acceptance of waste from all states. Fortunately, that proposal, touted by Barnwell officials and Chem-Nuclear representatives, failed to get approval. But why were legislators kept in the dark about contamination levels while they were discussing whether the flow of waste should be maintained?

The site is scheduled to be closed to all waste except that from members of a three-state compact — South Carolina, New Jersey and Connecticut — at the end of the year. In view of the recent revelations about contamination, the state should consider closing the dump altogether until Mr. McMaster gets some answers.

South Carolina long has served as a dumping ground for toxic waste from the around the nation, while state residents were assured there was no need to worry.

For 36 years, South Carolina has allowed radioactive waste disposal at the Barnwell site — a service that only a few states have been willing to provide. South Carolina shouldn't have to sustain unsafe levels of contamination as a result of the dump's operation.

Mr. McMaster has begun asking the hard questions about public health and safety associated with the operation of the Barnwell nuclear waste site — and about the extent to which DHEC has been providing the necessary attention and public disclosure. The state deserves a full explanation and corrective action.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.


Hot Topics

 



.Link.