Subscribe | Manage Your Subscription | E-Edition | About Us | Place A Classified Ad | Advertising Rates | Wedding Forms
Close Panel
Weather
Home
Story Index Your Lowcountry Lottery Traffic Cam Weddings Obituaries E-Edition
News
Local/State AP Nation/World Politics Columnists Special Reports Offbeat Report News Text Alerts Archives
Watchdog
Restaurant Inspections Parking Violations Sex Offender Locator Busted or Sued State Salaries Fraud Report Fraud/Abuse
Sports
Local Sports High School College Clemson Carolina Battery Riverdogs Stingrays National Sports Sports Columnists
Business
Local Business Business Review Real Estate Automotive Columnists
Multimedia
Video Audio Photo Galleries Books Man On The Street Share Photos Share Video
Entertainment
Preview Events Restaurants Movies TV Listings Music Columnists Games Comics
Features
Moxie Your Health Family Life Arts/Travel Home/Garden Food Get Out People Faith/Values Columnists
Supplements
Lowcountry Parent Tideline Magazine Lowcountry Paws Physicians Directory Attorney Directory Real Estate Guide All Supplements
Blogs
Bryce Donovan State Politics Battery RiverDogs Stingrays Carolina The Citadel Clemson College of Charleston Prep Sports Lowcountry Links Running Family Life Parenting
Editorial
Editorials Letters to the Editor Submit a Letter Commentary Cartoons
Customer Care
Contact Us About Us Subscribe Place An Ad


Check-cashing company to settle lawsuit for $20,000

Saturday, August 4, 2007


COLUMBIA - A check-cashing company doing business in South Carolina will pay $20,000 to settle a lawsuit that claimed the company discriminated against a pregnant employee in Charleston.

A complaint filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission last year alleged that EZ Money Inc., EZ Check Cashing of Charlotte Inc. and Greenville International Inc. discriminated against Constance Times, who was a collections manager at an EZ Check Cashing location in Charleston.

'The EEOC takes pregnancy discrimination claims very seriously,' EEOC attorney Lynette Barnes said.

'The law ensures that women cannot be fired for becoming pregnant or taking maternity leave. No one should have to choose between motherhood and her livelihood.'

Times was replaced by a man when she was fired in September 2005, the EEOC said.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.





.Link.