ERROR: Macro postandcourier/header is missing!

Charleston City Council gave the midnight ordinance preliminary approval, but some members now are saying they acted too hastily. Paul Zoeller/Staff. Buy this photo

Come 2 a.m., King Street in the Holy City of Charleston rivals any great American thoroughfare in its display of unbridled debauchery.

Some had hoped to put a damper on the perpetual fiesta. Now, the Post and Courier's Diane Knich reports, at least some on City Council are re-thinking their tune on a midnight bar and restaurant ban.

Local businesses ­- which largely hadn't weighed in before - plan to show up in force to a public meeting Thursday.

If the ordinance passed the way it's written today, new businesses selling alcoholic beverages in the heart of the historic tourist and nightlife district would have to close at midnight instead of 2 a.m. The district includes the Market, a portion of East Bay Street, all of King Street and much of Meeting Street.

The ordinance also would prohibit many businesses within it from operating between the hours of midnight and 6 a.m., including food stores, gas stations, restaurants, bars and other establishments that sell alcohol. It would not apply to restaurant and bars in establishments, such as hotels, that have more than 20 living or sleeping units.

Aside from confusing thousands of regulars, the ban threatens the businesses that built the area into what it is, opponents said. As one put it: "They put their blood, sweat and tears and their money into it."


Gov. Haley touts work of regulatory task force (P&C)

Bloomberg gives money to Sen. Graham PAC (P&C)

DJJ suspends three employees after apparent suicide (P&C)

South Carolina's wind power lies offshore (Greenville Online)

South Carolina, other states adopting 'new' Common Core standards (Huff Post)

Anybody want some locally foraged mushrooms? The state allows that now. (SC Radio)

Comments { } is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.