As an aspiring medical student, when I heard about the possibility of the College of Charleston and the Medical University of South Carolina merging, I was all ears. First of all, my decision to go to CofC was heavily influenced by its close proximity to MUSC. My rationale was that I would have plentiful opportunities to apply to positions at MUSC — in order to test the waters and see if medicine was really right for me.
I was exuberant with enthusiasm when I heard of a possible merger: I would have access to more experts and research opportunities.
With a merger, more CofC students would work on MUSC projects, and thus more research would be generated for the Charleston area. I recently read a scientific study that concluded bigger research teams yield more research than smaller counterparts.
With a merger, MUSC will be able to increase the number of people working on research projects. With each human addition, a new perspective is added. Combining many ideas to form one large, all-encompassing idea is what will stimulate and produce the best research.
As a Charleston resident, I want this research to be happening here — not in other research-heavy areas such as the Research Triangle in North Carolina.
With research, comes innovation, and I want Charleston to show up on the map as one of the nation’s most innovative and forward-thinking areas.
Research could equip students and professors alike with knowledge to improve local businesses and organizations. This will result in a more efficient business community for Charleston.
The merger would benefit me as a student, provide me with opportunities to research and help me further decide what I want to do once I graduate.
But ultimately it would benefit the Charleston community. It would generate more research for Charleston.
It would result in more state-of-the-art ideas, which could be translated to the business community, which would most importantly help the area generate economic growth.
Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point.