Immigration reform has been a quagmire, largely because of demands by Democrats for all or nothing. They would not agree to increase the numbers of visas for skilled workers unless the Republicans agreed to legalize the more than 10 million immigrants who are in the country without documentation — and did it on their terms. Democrats also allowed special-interest groups such as Big Labor to craft a complex immigration bill that is riddled with imperfections.
Last week President Barack Obama made a startling concession: He would accept a piecemeal approach to overhauling America’s immigration system. “If they want to chop that thing up into five pieces, as long as all five pieces get done, I don’t care what it looks like,” Obama said in a Wall Street Journal interview.
I have long argued that comprehensive immigration reform — as it has been proposed — is not politically palatable. Both parties generally agree on the need for high-skilled immigrants. Both parties realize that the country cannot possibly deport millions. But the path to citizenship that the Democrats have insisted on is a deal breaker. Given that adding millions of voters to the electoral rolls could permanently alter the electoral balance of the country, Republicans have dug in their heels.
The president seems ready to play a better game. So let’s take him up on this. Here are my suggestions:
1) Enact the DREAM Act, to provide basic human rights — and citizenship — to the 1.8 million children whose undocumented parents brought them to this country to give them a better future. These children grew up as Americans, believing they were entitled to the same rights and freedoms as their friends. But because they don’t have proper paperwork, they are forced to live in the shadows with limits on where they can work and study and on what they can do.
2) A start-up visa would allow foreign entrepreneurs to set up shop in the U.S., boost innovation and create jobs. The Kauffman Foundation estimates that this visa could add 1.6 million jobs and boost the nation’s gross domestic product by as much as 1.6 percent within 10 years.
3) Increase the number of permanent-resident visas for foreign doctors, scientists and engineers. More than 500,000 skilled workers — with 555,000 family members — are legally in the U.S. , waiting for visas that give them the freedom to change jobs and enjoy the same rights as other Americans. Waiting times for these visas often stretch into the decades. So these highly skilled immigrants are getting frustrated and returning home. We are bleeding competitiveness.
4) Provide temporary work visas for unskilled workers in non-farm jobs, such as in hospitality, food processing, construction, cleaning and maintenance. According to ImmigrationWorks USA’s president, Tamar Jacoby, every year from 2003 to 2009, more than 350,000 low-skilled foreigners came to the U.S. illegally to do this work. She says that the only way to prevent future illegal immigration is to create a legal way to meet the continuing demand. Employers should have to try to hire Americans first, but, if they don’t succeed, then could hire foreign workers quickly, easily and legally. And she says that the new program should grow in good economic times and shrink in bad times, when more U.S. citizens are out of work.
5) Expand the numbers of H-1B visas according to market demand; relax the conditions on those that tether the worker to the employer; and allow spouses of H-1B workers to work. Silicon Valley is starved for talent. It can’t hire graduates of the nation’s top engineering programs because they happen to be born abroad. Yes, there are, as critics of the H-1B program claim, abuses of these visas by unscrupulous employers. But this is largely because the employee can’t easily change jobs while waiting for a permanent-resident visa. Relaxing the visa regulations will free up the market by allowing immigrants to work for employers who pay the best wages. And it is unconscionable that wives of H-1B workers — who tend to be as qualified as their husbands — are forced to stay home, in servitude.
In a perfect world, we would surely provide a path to citizenship for the undocumented. We don’t want to create a subclass of immigrants who have lesser rights than others.
The vast majority of undocumented immigrants want basic human rights more than the right to vote. They want the freedom to work, pay taxes and go home to visit their relatives and friends. Note that from the last immigration-reform measure, in 1986 — which provided amnesty to the undocumented — only 40 percent who qualified became U.S citizens. In other words, the majority chose not to take the path to citizenship that the Democrats are obsessing over.
Let’s provide permanent-resident visas to the undocumented and leave the issue of citizenship aside. One or two presidents from now, the country will have evolved further. I have little doubt that, by then, Americans will support providing equality — and citizenship — for all.
“We have kicked this particular can down the road long enough — everybody knows it,” Obama said Monday in San Francisco. It’s time for us to act.
Vivek Wadhwa is vice president of Innovation and Research at Singularity University and the Arthur & Toni Rembe Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University.
Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point.