SC agency's investment staff gets $1.4M bonuses

  • Posted: Friday, October 4, 2013 5:48 p.m.

COLUMBIA — Fourteen staff members of the agency that invests pension money for South Carolina public employees are receiving a combined $1.4 million in bonuses for the portfolio's performance.

Poll: Should state pension investment employees receive a bonus? Go to postandcourier.com to vote.

The Retirement System Investment Commission approved the performance payments last week for the agency's investment staff. The amounts range from $30,000 to $300,000.

Treasurer Curtis Loftis cast the board's lone no vote.

The payments were calculated according to a “performance incentive” plan that commissioners, including Loftis, approved unanimously last year. They are based on how returns on investments compare to goals over a one, two-, three- and five-period. Every eligible employee received the maximum under the plan, with amounts varying by position and base pay. It allowed the four highest-paid staff — the chief investment officer, deputy investment officer and two directors — to double their base salary.

The commission contends the payments are not bonuses, but rather part of employees' compensation, structured to attract and retain high-caliber staff in a way that rewards performance.

“Investment employees are compensated, by intention and in large part, by incentive pay,” said commission Chairman Reynolds Williams. “The incentive plan works as intended, and RSIC investment professionals contributed nearly half a billion dollars to the retirement fund through their active management. We believe that $1.4 million is a small price to pay for that kind of return.”

State senators also approved the plan last year, as state law required. On Friday, Loftis urged the Legislature to revisit the issue, saying “the mismatch of returns, fees and bonuses cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars every year.”

Loftis has long complained the agency pays too much in fees for too little return.

“It is clear the commission should spend less time paying outrageous bonuses and more time raising returns and lowering fees,” he said.

The state's portfolio is worth $27 billion. Last month, the agency reported a net return, after fees and expenses, of 9.99 percent for the fiscal year ending June 30. The state assumes a 7.5 percent annual return when calculating what it needs to keep the pension system solvent.

Last October, 12 employees split a total of $621,620, after the 2011-12 fiscal year closed with earnings of just 0.4 percent after fees, attributed to a rough last half of 2011.

That represented the first payments to staff under the performance-based plan initially approved in March 2012 by the commission's three-person compensation subcommittee, which includes Loftis. Each of the plan's pieces received a unanimous vote of approval, following recommendations of the international consulting firm McLagan, which was hired to evaluate the plan.

The full commission unanimously approved the incentive plan a week later. It then gave unanimous approval to the agency's compensation policy in May 2012, according to the meeting minutes.

Loftis declined to address why he voted repeatedly for the formula last year but voted against the amounts last week.

The comptroller general's office said 13 employees are receiving their money in Friday's paychecks. One person asked to be paid later this month, said Eric Ward, spokesman for the state's top accountant.


 

Comments { }

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.