With the U.S. Postal Service on the verge of bankruptcy, the agency’s Board of Governors was scheduled to begin discussions on an emergency postal rate increase this week.
While a rate hike would raise revenue in the short term, it also would have the likely effect of chasing away customers — something that the USPS can ill afford.
“Increasing rates cannot be part of a sustainable solution because this will add to the Postal Service’s structural deficit problem by driving more postal volume to e-commerce competitors,” said Rafe Morrissey, a spokesman for the Greeting Card Association, in comments quoted by The Washington Post Thursday.
There has to be a better way, and Congress should follow through on reform measures. Separate bills in the House and Senate would temporarily relieve the Postal Service of a legal requirement to set aside $5.5 billion a year to provide for future pension and health insurance obligations established through collective bargaining with the postal unions.
The Government Accountability Office warned last year, however, that reducing the pre-funding requirement, over the long term, could lead to insufficient reserves that might have to be covered by taxpayers.
Postal unions would rather eliminate the pre-funding requirement outright, but that would increase the likelihood that those obligations eventually will be dumped on the taxpayer.
The unions also disagree with other cost-saving proposals that could result in a loss of jobs.
Postmaster General Patrick Donohoe has put forth an alternative cost-cutting plan to create a new Postal Service health benefits plan and require retirees to make greater use of Medicare.
Clearly, something needs to be done, with the USPS losing $15.9 billion last year.
Congress should get behind cost-cutting measures that will help solve the postal service’s financial crisis without an emergency rate increase or a federal bailout.
Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point.