Advisory panel votes not to store waste at SRS

  • Posted: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:01 a.m.

A group that advises the U.S. Department of Energy voted Tuesday against storing nuclear waste at the Savannah River Site near Aiken.

The Citizens Advisory Board is planning to file an official position paper on the issue, stated the Aiken Standard.

In 2011, the Obama administration scuttled plans to use Nevada’s Yucca Mountain as a long-term waste storage facility. Congress is considering other permanent options, and Savannah River is being discussed as a potential interim storage site. Next week, a U.S. Senate committee is set to hold a hearing on the issue.

Spent nuclear fuel is already stored at Savannah River, and opponents fear that the site could become a permanent home for the waste. The 310-square-mile complex once produced plutonium and tritium for atomic bombs, but work there is now focused mostly on research and cleaning up contaminated areas.

The panel also voted to ask the Energy Department to outline its fuel disposal plans and to revisit the Yucca Mountain proposal.

Members also voted to restore full funding to the Energy Department’s 2014 fiscal year budget. The administration’s current proposal includes millions in cuts that some fear could mean hundreds of jobs lost at Savannah River.

The Citizens Advisory Board is scheduled to meet again in September in Savannah.

Comments { }

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.