Graham plans to block defense, CIA picks

  • Posted: Monday, February 11, 2013 12:01 a.m.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee member Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is threatening to block the nominations of Chuck Hagel and John Brennan until he gets answers about the attack in Benghazi, Libya.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., still not satisfied with the administration’s answers to questions about the attack on a U.S. diplomatic outpost in Libya, said Sunday that he would try to delay Senate confirmation of President Barack Obama’s nominees for Defense secretary and CIA director.

Graham, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” that he would seek to block votes on Chuck Hagel as defense secretary and John Brennan as CIA director until he gets a better explanation of what the president was doing during the attack in September on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, which killed four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens.

“This is a complete system failure, and I’m going to get to the bottom of it,” he said.

Graham said he would put a hold on the two confirmation votes. Under Senate rules, a hold can be a tough procedural obstacle. Sixty votes are needed to end a hold and bring a motion to the Senate floor.

Republican critics, including Graham, have been hammering at the administration’s response since shortly after the raid in September, criticizing early statements that linked the attack to demonstrations to a video that was critical of Islam. On Sunday, Graham raised asked whether the president intervened to try to speed more help to the besieged compound.

“I don’t know what the president did that evening. I don’t know if he ever called anyone,” Graham said.

Democratic Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, also appearing on the program, said that Graham’s threat was “unprecedented and unwarranted.”

He said Graham had the right to ask “legitimate questions,” but not to try to block the nominations from an up-or-down vote.

Comments { }

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.