Town hall meeting draws mostly negative comments on Charleston emergency tax increase

  • Posted: Thursday, February 7, 2013 9:17 a.m.
    UPDATED: Thursday, February 7, 2013 8:45 p.m.
  • Text size: A A A

Downtown residents tonight questioned whether Charleston Mayor Joe Riley is showing a “knee-jerk” reaction to school violence with his emergency $3.9 million tax hike to bring police coverage to all the city’s elementary schools.

Others questioned whether the city is piling on its wish list, taking advantage of a bad situation by pushing for more police and fire stations weeks after the balanced 2013 city budget was passed.

“We just had the state-of-the-city (address) and the mayor said ‘everything’s fine,’ ” one man said before tonight’s forum even started.

The comments came during an informal meeting called by City Councilman Mike Seekings on Riley’s proposed $3.9 million tax increase. It drew about 30 people.

The tax hike would go to hire 19 new police officers to patrol 35 public, private and parochial elementary schools around the city. Additionally, the increase would pay for eight more officers in the King and Market streets entertainment districts, and for two new fire stations, on Daniel Island and in West Ashley.

The increase would add $40 in property taxes on a house valued at $250,000. But other forms of property taxes would increase as well, including for cars and vehicles, officials said.

Comments { }

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.