DALLAS — Some frequent fliers say they aren’t worried about safety aboard Boeing’s problem-plagued 787 aircraft, while many less-seasoned travelers are often unaware of what model of plane they are flying on.
Gov. Nikki Haley, one of Boeing’s biggest boosters in South Carolina who once called the 787 a “mack daddy” airplane, said Friday she placed a call to the company’s North Charleston plant amid the recent high-profile Dreamliner glitches.Haley said she was told the Boeing team is “working on it” and “doing fine.”“This is a hiccup like any other hiccup that we see companies go through,” she said during a stop at the Google data center near Goose Creek. “This one’s playing out a little more publicly.”She added, “I think this is just a matter of them going through their processes to see where the missing link is, and once they fix it, we’re back on track.”Brendan Kearney
That makes it anyone’s guess whether Boeing, or the airlines that use its planes, will pay a price for concerns surrounding the 787. The planes were grounded worldwide Wednesday after a battery fire on one, and an emergency landing on another after pilots smelled something burning. Overcharged lithium batteries are a suspected cause.
“I’m as excited today to get on a 787 as I was a year ago,” said Edward Pizzarello, a travel blogger who has logged four flights on the 787 Dreamliner. “Boeing will fix this, and I’ll be flying on this plane for many years.”
Lee Simonetta, a research engineer at Georgia Tech, said he too would hop on the Dreamliner again. He was among the aviation fanatics aboard the plane’s first trip with paying customers, an All Nippon Airways flight from Tokyo to Hong Kong in October 2011.
It was a time to marvel at a jet made of composite materials that make it lighter and far more fuel-efficient, and at its use of electrical systems to do just about everything.
That was before a series of incidents including fuel leaks, cracked windshields and overheating batteries gained worldwide attention. Photos of charred battery boxes from the planes popped up all over the Internet.
Safety officials around the world took a second look at the planes, and the Federal Aviation Administration grounded 787s in this country. United Airlines is the only U.S. carrier to fly them, but several foreign airlines use them on flights to and from the U.S.
Boeing officials and some frequent fliers said there are hiccups with just about every new plane, and the 787 was a particularly bold technological leap over previous aircraft. But will those reassurances satisfy the flying public?
Mary Schiavo, a former inspector general of the U.S. Transportation Department and FAA critic who now is an aviation lawyer with Motley Rice in Mount Pleasant, said she would not fly aboard a Dreamliner.
“It’s very serious. Nobody wants to get on a plane with these things happening,” Schiavo said.
Schiavo said she thinks that if Boeing and the FAA believe there is something wrong with a few batteries, replacing them with other lithium-ion batteries would be a quick repair. But, she said, the FAA might force Boeing to use an entirely different type of battery, which could require redesign work and a new round of regulatory approvals that might take months.
Blake Fleetwood, president of Cook Travel in New York, said a few customers have called in the past two days to ask about the plane, but none have changed their itineraries. Of course, those flights won’t involve 787s if safety regulators haven’t cleared the planes by takeoff time.
“A month ago we had people who were dying to get on this plane,” Fleetwood said. “Now they’re showing a bit more trepidation.”
Many people who don’t fly frequently may not even notice what type of plane they are on.
From interviews with more than two dozen travelers at Houston’s Bush Intercontinental Airport and Boston’s Logan International Airport, it appeared that price, schedule and nonstop service are more important to consumers than the type plane itself. Just a few knew that the government had grounded the 787.
Chris Boyd, 57, said that if he had the option now, he “wouldn’t really be interested” in flying on a Dreamliner. But in general the psychologist from Sudbury, Mass., doesn’t care about the type of plane he flies on “as long as it meets the standards of safety and you can be reasonably sure that you’re goning to get off the plane on the other end.”
He didn’t know the type of plane that would be taking him and his wife to Washington from Boston.
Curtis Johnson, a retailer from San Antonio, said he purposely booked on a 787 last month from Houston to Newark, N.J. “Very impressive,” he said, describing the large windows, wide seats and other flourishes.
Johnson said he pays attention to the type of plane when he books a long flight, and he admitted that he might be “a little bit more nervous than I was three weeks ago” about the 787.
Christine Carlton, who arrived on a United flight from San Antonio, said she wouldn’t seek to change planes, but would instead “just be stuck and hope for the best.”
Many sounded like Casey Ager, a 22-year-old from Seattle, who said he wouldn’t have any misgivings about getting on a 787.
“If it’s out there and they’re letting us fly, I trust it’s ready to go,” he said.
The Post and Courier contributed to this report.
Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point.