Taking the ‘public’ out of public streets

  • Posted: Monday, January 14, 2013 12:03 a.m.
  • Text size: A A A
From this point at Mixson and East Montague avenues, it’s less than a mile to Charleston County School of the Arts and Academic Magnet High School. That drive takes nearly 30 minutes because of North Charleston traffic restrictions, according to parents. Buy this photo

Urban planners say that interconnected local streets are a great way to improve the flow of traffic, but when lots of people take to cutting through residential neighborhoods, complaints often follow.

In North Charleston, the crush of people trying to get more than 2,000 students and staff to five public schools in the same location each morning prompted the city to close the Cameron Terrace and Oak Park neighborhoods to school-bound through-traffic.

The same thing happened in Dorchester County in 2007, when school-related traffic cutting through the King’s Grant subdivision prompted through-traffic prohibitions and patrols by sheriff’s deputies.

A year earlier, Mount Pleasant sent police out to the Charleston National subdivision to stop some of the 1,150 Wando High School students with parking passes from cutting through the neighborhood to avoid traffic-choked U.S. Highway 17. Then-Councilman Joe Bustos even went up in a helicopter to get a bird’s-eye view of the situation, but the town didn’t go so far as to ban through-traffic.

In countless neighborhoods, from downtown Charleston to the suburbs, speed humps have been installed to prevent cut-through traffic from speeding. Through-traffic prohibitions are seen as a more extreme step that’s been used sparingly in the region, starting in 2005 with Charleston’s decision to restrict traffic on River Point off Folly Road.

Under South Carolina law, motorists are required to obey “traffic-control devices” such as signs prohibiting through traffic. North Charleston has a similar city ordinance, and in both cases the penalty is a $237 fine, plus court-related costs, and a hefty 4 points on the driver’s license.

Comments { }

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.