BY ERNEST F. HOLLINGS
In the recent Person of the Year issue of Time, President Obama responds in an interview: “In our foreign policy, do we believe that sort of garrison state and that our leadership is dependent on bluster and bullying other countries to bend to our will, or do we think that our leadership is driven in part by our values and our ideals?”
If ever there was a garrison state in the world, it would be the United States. We spend more on defense than the leading countries combined. The U.S. has 196,000 deployed around the world and is now stationing military personnel in every country we think might have some terrorists.
In 2006, the Pentagon declared in its Quadrennial Defense Review Report that it would be against any or all “who seek to destroy our free way of life.”
In short, we aim to drone-kill them before they kill us. Our drone-killing terrorizes countries around the world; makes more enemies than it eliminates.
Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia would appreciate “bluster and bullying” rather than drone-killing.
In the last issue of Newsweek (Dec. 24), an article questions: “Will Obama end the war on terror?”
Apparently the president intends to keep it going.
Mr. President, the campaign is over! Get real. You upped the troops in Afghanistan to be strong on defense against the Republicans. Now you deploy 2,500 Marines to Australia for the same reason. Australia is not going to war with China. Neither are we.
With nuclear weapons scattered around the world, the U.S. can no longer act like a military superpower. We are overextended. Congress is not going to send GIs to the South China Sea to be killed in the dispute between China and Vietnam, nor in the dispute between China and Japan over the Senkaku Islands, nor in the dispute between China and Taiwan. We’ve got to return to our Good Neighbor Policy, set, as you say, by our values and our ideals.
In today’s nuclear world there is no such thing as a military superpower. Any military conflict between China and the U.S. threatens to go nuclear. Even little North Korea is a nuclear threat. As the U.S. puffs and blows around the world like a military superpower, China quietly but vigorously develops its economy. China is our principal competition in foreign policy. We not only ignore China’s competition but support it by offshoring our research, innovation, technology, production, jobs, payrolls — our economy — to China.
China aims to become the world’s economic superpower. China has already brought 300 million from poverty to the middle class and in three more years, it will bring another 300 million into the middle class. China alters acquired technology, patents it, and the altered product becomes the article in trade.
When China moves to prosper its remaining 700 million people, it will thank the U.S., bid it goodbye and Corporate America will return home and have nothing to produce.
We think we are developing freedom and democracy in China. China’s leaders know that they will have to keep control of their economy and vast population or the country will come apart.
China develops a strong military, not just to defend China but to defend the Central Committee. The Central Committee uses the military to keep law and order as its people gain more rights and freedom. We need to develop democracy in the U.S. by bringing home enough of Corporate America to rebuild our economy. BusinessWeek recently reported that “the bargaining position that the White House brought to the fiscal cliff talks is essentially its budget from last spring which proposes to stabilize the debt ratio at a level a little higher than now: between 75 percent and 80 percent.”
In my 30 years on the Senate Budget Committee, we never talked about “stabilizing the debt ratio” or “10-year plans” or reducing “spending to a certain percentage of the GDP.” We either cut programs we could no longer afford or raised revenues to stop the borrowing.
We have increased the national debt $10 trillion in 12 years. We are running trillion-dollar deficits each year.
The economy is on steroids. We’ve got to cut out this nonsense and pay for government. We can do this by replacing the 35 percent corporate tax with a 7 percent value added tax. This tax cut produces $872 billion in revenues instead of last year’s corporate tax of $181.1 billion. With spending cuts we can balance the budget and stop the borrowing in two years. This releases $1 trillion in offshore profits for Corporate America to repatriate tax free, invest, and start rebuilding our economy.
Ernest F. “Fritz” Hollings, a Democrat, served as governor of South Carolina from 1959-63 and in the U.S. Senate from 1966-2005.
Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point.