Federal government sues shipping companies tied to 2009 oil spill

  • Posted: Saturday, October 27, 2012 12:25 a.m.
  • Text size: A A A
Oil linked to a spill from the cargo ship John F. was discovered among the reeds on Seabrook Island in 2009. Buy this photo

The federal government is suing a cargo ship owner and others for expenses and damages stemming from the extensive cleanup following a oil spill three years ago in Charleston Harbor.

The lawsuit

What: The U.S. government is suing the owner and operator of the John F., the cargo vessel tied to the oil spill in Charleston Harbor in 2009.

Suit: Lawyers are asking a federal judge to award local and federal agencies $354,092 for cleanup costs, in addition to monetary damages for destruction and loss of natural resources related to the incident.

Incident: On Oct. 19, 2009, the 600-foot vessel John F. spewed oil into the harbor while taking on fuel from a barge.

Federal attorneys filed a civil suit Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Charleston, seeking reimbursement from Black Med Lines, LTD, Fairsky Shipping and Trading, S.A., and their insurance companies for cleanup and other charges from the October 2009 oil spill by the John F., a 600-foot cargo vessel.

The filing claims the Greece-based owner and operators of the vessel failed to take necessary precautions to prevent the oil spill, which leaked black globs of oil on 60 miles of area shoreline.

The suit asks that the companies be held liable under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, enacted in response to the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil-tanker spill, requiring payment for removal costs and damages caused by a spill, including damages to natural resources.

The federal lawsuit came just weeks after another shipping line, Evergreen International S.A., agreed to pay federal and South Carolina departments for an incident that spilled 12,500 gallons of oil into the Cooper River and Charleston Harbor a decade ago.

Wednesday’s federal filing stated that the John F. was taking on heavy bunker fuel from a barge while anchored in the harbor during the afternoon of Oct. 19. The operation halted after crew members discovered fuel discharging from a vent for one of the fuel tanks, but not before some spilled over the vessel’s side and into the harbor, according to the document.

The statement added that the spill occurred because the valve used to isolate a fuel tank was broken, and “the overflow of fuel went undetected for an unknown period of time.”

The incident caused oil slicks in the harbor and barrier islands.

The federal government is asking a judge for an award for damages and for destruction to natural resources, in addition to $354,092, plus interest from John F. owners and operators for the nearly two-week cleanup cost.

Lawyers representing the companies did not respond to attempts for comment Friday.

Last month, shipping company Evergreen agreed to pay nearly $1 million to numerous local and federal agencies for damages caused by a 2002 incident when the company’s ship struck a submerged steel dredge pipe and polluted shores and marshes along Noisette Creek at the former Navy base.

The consent decree followed about $4 million Evergreen already has paid for the cleanup effort, which involved bird rescues, boat and pier cleaning and reimbursement for property damage.

Reach Tyrone Richardson at 843-937-5550 and follow him on Twitter @tyrichardsonPC.

Comments { }

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.