Legislators collect more than $1.4 million in reimbursements
COLUMBIA — State lawmakers piled almost $1.5 million worth of reimbursements during the last fiscal year for items including travel and lodging, according to information from the S.C. Comptroller General’s Office.
MORE COVERAGE
Visit post andcourier.com for a full breakdown of legislative reimbursements for the last fiscal year.
The reimbursements — which are on par with totals from recent years — come in addition to the $10,400 salary and $1,000 per month for in-district expenses each of the state’s 124 representatives and 46 senators receive.
How much they spent
Charleston County delegation reimbursements
Senate
Sen. Chip Campsen, R-Charleston: $12,550
Sen. Robert Ford, D-Charleston: $13,645.13
Sen. Clementa Pinckney, D-Ridgeland: $14,028
Sen. Mike Rose, R-Summerville: $15,524.29
Sen. Larry Grooms, R-Bonneau: $13,258
Sen. Raymond Cleary, R-Murrells Inlet: $12,094
Most: (Sen. Thomas Alexander, R-Walhalla): $17,613
Total Senate*: $470,030.75
House
Rep. Jenny Horne, R-Summerville: $9,687
Rep. Chris Murphy, R-Summerville: $9,778.84
Rep. Jim Merrill, R-Daniel Island: $11,919.65
Rep. Kevin Ryan, R-Pawleys Island: $11,483.15
Rep. David Mack, D-North Charleston: $11,600.02
Rep. Chip Limehouse, R-Charleston: $12,547.73
Rep. Wendell Gilliard, D-Charleston*: $10,787.17
Rep. Mike Sottile, R-Isle of Palms: $11,174.06
Rep. Seth Whipper, D-North Charleston: $10,158.32
Rep. Bobby Harrell, R-Charleston: $12,342.80
Rep. Peter McCoy, R-Charleston: $10,426.93
Rep. Robert Brown, D-Hollywood: $10,233.63
Rep. Bill Crosby, R-North Charleston: $,11,110.85
Rep. Leon Stavrinakis, D-Charleston: $10,959.11
Most: (Rep. Bill Sandifer, R-Seneca) $15,768.90
Total House**: $974,541.97
* Earlier versions of this story incorrectly reported Rep. Gilliard’s reimbursements at $19,787.17. His total actually was $10,787.17.
** A small group of lawmakers also received separate reimbursements for trips to Columbia for meetings during the legislative off-season
Some lawmakers say that’s not enough, while critics urge a shorter legislative session that would entail fewer reimbursements.
The reimbursements come from a variety or sources.
Lawmakers receive $131 for each legislative day during the January-to-June legislative session, and mileage expenses for one trip from home to Columbia and back during the session.
Representatives receive 44.5 cents per mile, while senators can claim 50 cents per mile.
Some lawmakers also receive reimbursements for travel to conferences and for official business during the legislative off-season.
Critics, such as the conservative S.C. Policy Council and some legislators, have repeatedly called over the years for a shorter legislative session to cut down on reimbursement totals, among other goals.
But historically, those efforts have failed to clear the Senate.
Longtime Democratic Sen. Robert Ford of Charleston said the reimbursements don’t come close to covering the cost of serving as a legislator in South Carolina.
Ford received $13,645 worth of reimbursements last fiscal year, which put him roughly in the middle of the pack among Charleston-area senators.
He said mileage reimbursements shouldn’t be limited to one round-trip per week during the session.
Ford said he often has to return home to Charleston during the week to help constituents, who have grown in numbers in each lawmakers’ district as the state has gained population.
“That’s wrong because if you’re doing your job as a state senator, they should give mileage reimbursement and per diem,” Ford said.
Lawmakers can receive a $35 per diem for meals, but only when the Legislature is not in session.
Some officials have to return to Columbia during the week to attend committee hearings or other official business during off months.
Those lawmakers receive a round-trip mileage reimbursement for each approved trip to the capital in addition to the per diem.
Reimbursement amounts and pay have been frozen for several years.
Ford said it’s time for the Legislature to take another look at the rates.
“We work six months a year officially, and unofficially we have to serve constituents. When we tell people what we make, nobody believes it,” he said.
Totals vary widely
Generally, the lawmakers who live in or close to Columbia had the smallest reimbursement totals for the fiscal year that ended in June.
Columbia Democratic Rep. Chris Hart takes pride in his miniscule reimbursement total — just $8.90.
Hart said he lives less than five miles from the Statehouse and generally turns down reimbursements, though he was compensated for mileage for two trips costing $4.45 each.
“I just figured I could save some taxpayer money,” he said.
At the other end of the spectrum is Sen. Thomas Alexander, R-Walhalla. Alexander had the largest reimbursement of any senator at $17,613.
Alexander attributed his large total to long treks to Columbia from the mountains of Oconee County.
“I have a longer drive than virtually everybody in Senate, and perfect attendance,” he said. “That’s the extent of it. But I hadn’t really thought about it, to be honest with you.”
Alexander’s total also was driven up by a $525 reimbursement for a registration fee to attend a National Conference of State Legislatures meeting.
Legislators are allowed to receive reimbursements for travel to conferences and associated fees, as long as the trips are approved by chamber leadership.
The data from the Comptroller General’s office shows the state paid for several legislators to attend conferences, both in South Carolina and out of state.
As The Post and Courier reported last month, the payments include the hotel fees for a dozen lawmakers — including three from Charleston — to stay at the luxury Charleston Place hotel for a September conference last year.
The Comptroller General’s Office provided the data to the newspaper in response to an S.C. Freedom of Information Act request.
Reach Stephen Largen at 864-641-8172 and follow him on Twitter @stephenlargen.

Comments { }
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.