Charleston County greenbelt program proposes $11.9 million deal for Fairlawn tract

  • Posted: Saturday, July 28, 2012 12:47 a.m.
  • Text size: A A A

The last deal done under Charleston County’s rural greenbelt program could be its biggest yet: $11.9 million for the 6,000-acre Fairlawn tract, the last large chunk of privately held land inside the Francis Marion National Forest.

Fairlawn: Biggest by far

Regardless of whether measuring in terms of dollars or acres protected, the proposed Fairlawn deal ($11.9 million; 6,018 acres) would be the biggest ever made under the county’s greenbelt program.



5 MOST COSTLY (in millions)

ProjectPrice tag

Jefferson tract in Awendaw $5.2

Wideawake plantation in Hollywood $4.8

Rifle Range Road tract in Mt. P. $4.7

Bulow Hunt Club near Hollywood $4.1

Tibwin outside McClellanville $4.0



5 LARGEST TRACTS

ProjectAcreage

Hampton Inc. in McClellanville 1,124

Hermitage Plantation in Adams Run 1,086

Tibwin outside McClellanville 900

Bugby Plantation on Wadmalaw Island 890

Bryan Dairy on Johnson Island 852



Note: The largest tracts weren’t always the most expensive because they involved conservation easements rather than fee-simple land purchases (as all the most costly projects were). Among the largest tracts, only Tibwin was fee-simple.



Source: Charleston County

The proposal is as complicated as the former plantation is huge, and there’s no guarantee that five County Council members will approve it on Aug. 16.

Fairlawn would take what’s left

Charleston County voters approved a half-cent sales tax in 2004, and part of the money was set to go to land conservation, parks and open space under a greenbelt program. Eight years later, here’s what remains in those pots of money (in millions):



Program Allocation Committed Remaining

Rural $65.3 $53.4 $11.9

Urban $28.5 $24.5 $4.1

PRC $36.0 $36.0 $0



Source: Charleston County

The Nature Conservancy and Ducks Unlimited application would protect a vast swath of wetlands and forests along U.S. Highway 17, one that, if developed instead, would worsen East Cooper’s traffic woes and make controlled burns in the Francis Marion a headache, if not a nonstarter.

Local conservationist Hugh Lane, chairman of the county’s Greenbelt Bank Board, said Fairlawn “has been under the microscope of the conservation community for a long time.”

“It is, in my opinion, a legacy conservation for South Carolina,” he added.

Sarah Hartman, land protection director with the Nature Conservancy’s South Carolina chapter, called Fairlawn a keystone project.

“It’s an amazing compromise,” she said. “Everybody is making sacrifices and getting something.”

The Nature Conservancy and Ducks Unlimited would protect about 6,028 acres by paying $11.2 million to buy 4,800 acres, then conveying it to the U.S. Forest Service, which owns and manages the Francis Marion National Forest.

Another $700,000 would be spent on a conservation easement for 1,193 adjoining acres.

The 4,800 acres would offer opportunities for public use such as canoeing, hiking and biking.

Most of the money would come from the county’s greenbelt program, while the conservation groups would put up $457,180.

The property owners, which include companies representing two families, would get certain hunting rights during the rest of their lifetimes, rights that would prohibit public hunting and fishing during hunting season.

In exchange, the conservation groups would get what they feel is a bargain, about $1,900 an acre.

Other greenbelt deals have averaged $3,200 per acre. They also would get a stronger buffer on the Francis Marion Forest’s southern end.

Also, the town of Awendaw and the Coastal Conservation League would agree to settle their lawsuit over Awendaw’s annexation of the Nebo tract, part of Fairlawn that would be developed.

Coastal Conservation League Director Dana Beach said the property is beautiful and historic, a former rice plantation that also includes an area where the very rare Bachman’s warbler was seen regularly during the 20th century.

Beach said the league feels more comfortable about development on the Nebo tract if nearby tracts are protected.

While the Nebo lawsuit going away would ensure that Awendaw’s boundaries won’t diminish, town Administrator Bill Wallace said he could not say that the town supports the deal.

“It depends on how the lawsuit is resolved,” he said. “Our Town Council has not taken a position. Our lawyers are working on a potential settlement of this lawsuit, but until it is settled, I don’t feel comfortable commenting about it.”

County Council Chairman Teddie Pryor said he has not decided if he favors the deal, saying that he needed more information about the lawsuit’s resolution.

“It concerns me too that they’ve got a deed restriction of gun rights for life,” he added. “That’s a problem. If you don’t have full rights to the property, I don’t think taxpayers would want to invest that kind of money.”

Louise Maybank, chairwoman of the Greenbelt Advisory Board, a group asked to ensure that the county’s greenbelt plan is properly implemented, said she hopes the overall good for the county’s conservation remains at the forefront as the details are debated.

“A similar project is not going to present itself. This is a lifetime opportunity,” she said. “It truly is the signature piece of the rural portion of the program.”

Lane noted that Fairlawn was one of the first tracts that conservationists eyed after county voters approved a half-cent sales tax in 2004, a vote that generated about $130 million for rural conservation and park projects.

“What a wonderful way to go out of business,” Lane said.

Reach Robert Behre at 937-5771.

Comments { }

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.