Judge to revisit S.C. immigration injunction

  • Posted: Saturday, July 7, 2012 12:01 a.m.
    UPDATED: Saturday, July 7, 2012 12:30 a.m.
  • Text size: A A A

Columbia — A federal judge will reconsider Monday his injunction against parts of South Carolina’s immigration law, including a requirement for local police to conduct immigration status checks.

U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel filed an order late last week, saying he likely would find it necessary to revise a portion of his injunction against the law, which was filed in late December. The hearing is scheduled for 10 a.m. in Charleston.

Gergel’s order comes on the heels of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on the controversial Arizona immigration law, which was the model for South Carolina.

In that ruling, the Supreme Court said states could require local law enforcement to conduct immigration checks, but it also warned against civil rights violations.

Gergel had blocked that portion of the S.C. law. He also blocked two other portions: a section making it a crime to harbor or transport an illegal immigrant, and a section requiring immigrants to carry registration documents.

The Supreme Court did not address the harboring issue, so that portion most likely will work its way through the appeals process.

The Supreme Court blocked the registration requirement, and legal experts said that section of the S.C. law will be struck down.

South Carolina’s immigration law was challenged by the U.S. Department of Justice and a coalition of immigrants and organizations that support them.

S.C. Attorney General Alan Wilson’s staff had filed an appeal to the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Comments { }

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.