Sugar fight takes another bitter turn

  • Posted: Sunday, June 24, 2012 12:01 a.m.
  • Text size: A A A

NEW YORK — What defines sugar? It’s getting to be a stickier question.

The Sugar Association is accusing the makers of high fructose corn syrup of trying to candy-coat their image by calling their product a “sugar.” The Corn Refiners Association is firing back by calling the accusations another attempt to censor its efforts to explain to the public that high fructose corn syrup is, well, a form of sugar.

The latest twist in the spat came after a recent medical study prompted headlines such as, “Sugar can make you dumb.” The Sugar Association issued a release noting the substance used in the study was actually fructose, not its sugar. The group blamed a “multimillion-dollar advertising campaign” by the Corn Refiners Association for generating the confusion.

Audrae Erickson, president of Corn Refiners Association, says the Sugar Association’s press release “seems to be an effort to silence the campaign” to educate consumers.

The two sides have been at odds for some time now.

Given the negative image of high fructose corn syrup in recent years, the Corn Refiners Association in 2010 submitted an application to the federal government to have the sweetening agent renamed “corn sugar” on nutrition labels. That decision is pending.

The group also has been running a marketing campaign to explain that its syrup is a form of sugar and has the same nutritional value as the white, granular table sugar consumers are familiar with.

That prompted a lawsuit from the Sugar Association last year claiming the campaign was misleading. An attorney for the group, John Burlingame, says it’s not trying to stifle free speech. It just wants to point out that high fructose corn syrup is chemically distinct and derived from a different source than sugar.

The American Medical Association has said there’s not enough evidence to restrict the use of high fructose corn syrup, although it wants more research. The Center for Science in the Public Interest has said that there was no evidence that the sweetener is any worse for the body than sugar — and that Americans eat too much of both of them.

Comments { }

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.