JK Harris’ founder improperly paid self millions, won’t cooperate with bankruptcy case, trustee alleges

  • Posted: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:17 p.m.
  • Text size: A A A
John K. Harris improperly took millions from his insolvent firm and should return the money, a court-appointed bankruptcy trustee alleges. File/Staff Buy this photo

John K. Harris, founder of a Goose Creek-based tax resolution business that was driven to bankruptcy by consumer complaints, improperly took millions from the insolvent firm and should return the money, a court-appointed bankruptcy trustee alleges.

JK Harris & Co. and several associated businesses shut down in January, several months after seeking bankruptcy protection to escape an attempt by the Texas Attorney General to force the company into receivership over consumer-related restitution payments and fines.

Employees weren’t paid for their last several weeks of work, according to court filings, creditors were owed more than $20 million that would not be repaid, and thousands of clients who counted on the company to resolve their tax problems were left in limbo.

In the months that have followed, the trustee handling the case has complained, as have some creditors, that Harris has not cooperated with efforts to identify assets of the defunct company. He has been a no-show at some meetings and hearings.

In a related civil suit, over unpaid rent at JK Harris former offices, 58-year-old Harris is being pursued for payment of a $355,972 judgment. Last month Harris testified before Judge Mikell R. Scarborough, Charleston County’s master in equity, that he had no assets except for about $400 in the bank and a boat with an overdue loan.

Scarborough ordered Harris to turn the boat over to his former landlord’s law firm.

Now, bankruptcy trustee Michelle Vieira is seeking a nearly $4.8 million judgement against Harris, alleging that he improperly took at least that much out of JK Harris and related companies while they were insolvent, from 2004 until they shut down.

Efforts to reach Harris’ attorney today were not immediately successful.

Read more in Thursday’s editions of The Post and Courier.

Comments { }

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.