Column: Problems with student loans linked to majors
Young people face a cruel irony. Most canít land a decent job without a college education, yet many graduates are locked into poorly paying positions that donít permit repayment of student loans.
For two generations, college price tags have risen much faster than inflation and familiesí ability to pay. More importantly, costs have leaped faster than what graduates can earn over lifetimes, and many diplomas do not offer a positive return on investment, as measured by graduatesí ability to service their debt.
Working professionals are moving in with older relatives ó they simply canít pay both rent and student loans.
Many never get out of debt. About 17 percent of delinquent student loans are owed by folks over 50, and Americans over 60 still owe $36 billion in unpaid loans. Too frequently, Social Security checks are garnisheed and debt collectors are harassing borrowers in their 80s.
Employers may be partially to blame. It was commonplace in the 1950s and í60s for jobs as diverse as copy editors at newspapers, retail store buyers, insurance adjustors, and laboratory technicians to have only a high school education and some employer training.
Now, despite the fact that employers must often still train new hires, they require some college or even a diploma. Requiring some higher education may be an easy way of screening an applicantís native intelligence, but many jobs simply donít pay enough for students to repay six figure debts in a decade or so.
K-12 public education is partially to blame. During the late 1960s, a sense emerged that the performance of high schools had declined. Judging from the reasoning, English and math skills of college freshmen, employers were probably right.
A few years of college became a proxy for employers that young applicants had what a decent high school diploma should guarantee but no longer didóthe ability to do more than read and add sums, but also reason and string together grammatically correct sentences into a coherent idea.
With half of the population headed to college, universities churned out too many graduates with little more than a general educationóthe ability to think critically, write a composition, and read poetry. Most college majors donít prepare graduates for much.
In recent decades, states cut aid to higher education when tax revenues dipped during recessions but did not adequately restore those when times got better. Consequently, community colleges, where some of the best, cost-efficient technical training is offered, and some universities cut more-expensive programs in engineering, nursing and the like. Too many students are herded into liberal studies of some kind.
What students do in college really matters. A worker with a bachelorís degree in petroleum engineering earns about $120,000, while a degree in counseling psychology fetches just $29,000. Even business degrees differ dramatically in value ó finance, accounting, and supply chain majors are worth a lot more than general business and human resources management graduates.
Sadly, many incoming students donít want to take tough majors ó engineering programs are stuffed with foreign students ó but that problem goes back to the high schools.
No surprise that many students come to universities only to enjoy intellectually pleasing but practically useless programs, and end up lost in poorly paying jobs and adrift in a sea of debt.
Peter Morici is a economist and professor at the University of Maryland Smith School of Business, who formerly served as director of the Office of Economics at the U.S. International Trade Commission.