Public meeting about Maybank Highway sheds light on 2 options for relieving congestion on Johns Island road
JOHNS ISLAND — Plans to improve Maybank Highway have started moving forward, unlike the traffic that at rush hour backs up on the bridge over the Stono River.
To comment
Charleston County Council is accepting comments through May 2 at www.ccroadwise.org/projects/maybank/comments.php. Comments also can be mailed to Charleston County RoadWise, 4045 Bridge View Drive, North Charleston, SC 29405.
Charleston County on Tuesday held a public meeting at Haut Gap Middle School to give residents information about two proposals to improve Maybank. One included widening the road from the Stono River bridge to Main Road. The other included building a “pitchfork” of smaller roads near the intersection of Maybank and River Road, which would disperse traffic from the congested intersection.
The plans
The main elements of the “pitchfork” plan are:
Construct a new, parallel, two-lane road to the north of Maybank Highway (on the right side of the road if traveling from James Island) from the intersection of Maybank Highway and Fenwick Hall Allee to River Road.
Construct a new, parallel, two-lane road to the south of Maybank Highway (on the left side of the road if traveling from James Island) from the Stono River Bridge to River Road.
Add right turn lanes at the intersection of River Road and Maybank Highway.
Construct a median and/or left turn lanes along Maybank Highway from River Road to Bohicket Road.
Accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians from River Road to Bohicket Road.
The main elements of the widening plan are:
Widen Maybank Highway from Main Road to River Road from the existing two-lane road to a four-lane, divided road with a landscaped median. In areas where there are numerous driveways, a center, two-way left turn lane would be added.
Widen Maybank Highway from River Road to the Stono River Bridge from the existing two-lane road to a four-lane, divided road with a wide natural median to protect the tree canopy.
Accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians from River Road to Bohicket Road.
Source: Charleston County
Charleston County Council directed county staffers to move forward with the “pitchfork” plan in 2009, said Kurt Taylor, the county administrator. But the National Environmental Policy Act requires the project to undergo an environmental review, he said. And that review requires that all “feasible and prudent” alternatives be considered. The original widening proposal is such an alternative, he said.
Hundreds of county residents attended the meeting.
Bill Saunders, from the group Concerned Citizens of the Sea Islands, said that although his group supports the pitchfork plan over the widening plan, he doesn’t think either alternative was designed to consider the needs of current residents of Johns Island. Both plans favor developers, he said. “They are selling this as a solution to a traffic problem,” he said. “But we don’t really have a traffic problem.”
Traffic could be improved with simple intersection improvements near the Stono River bridge, he said. And it could be reduced dramatically by improving the intersection at the gateway to Johns Island at Main Road and U.S. Highway 17.
Peter Valiquette, project manager from LPA Associates, said traffic on Maybank Highway would increase. In 2010, 17,200 vehicles used the road on an average day. By 2035, that number likely will jump to 25,300. And if the state decides to extend Interstate 526 to Johns and James islands, about 27,8000 vehicles would travel on Maybank Highway each day.
Not all who attended were opposed to the larger widening alternative.
Mark Wilderding, who lives on Johns Island, said he supports it. It’s important to build such roads before development takes place, he said. It’s much more difficult to widen roads after an area has experienced explosive growth.
Charleston County officials said the analysis of project alternatives should be complete sometime this summer. There then will be a public hearing in the spring of 2013. Construction should begin in the fall of 2014.

Comments { }
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.