Sheriff Al Cannon and Mayor Joe Riley face off over policing the expected new town of James Island.
The future of policing the planned new town of James Island was debated from afar on Wednesday by two local officials who don’t even live on the island.
Charleston County Sheriff Al Cannon and Charleston Mayor Joe Riley have differing views concerning law enforcement in the envisioned town. Cannon said it would be most efficient for all concerned if the sheriff’s office continues providing law enforcement in the area that may become the town. Riley contends the town couldn’t expect its police services to be “subsidized” forever by other county residents. The town would eventually have to create and fund its own police department, or contract with the county for law enforcement, Riley said.
About 8,700 voters will be eligible to vote in an April 24 referendum to decide whether to form a new town. A favorable vote would be followed by a municipal election for mayor and council on July 31.
Three previous James Island incorporation votes were successful, but the process was successfully challenged in court by the city of Charleston. The third version of the town was dissolved by the state last summer. The new town, the fourth, would have about 11,000 residents.
Bill Woolsey, a former James Island mayor who is heading up the new incorporation effort, has said the town would receive state revenue sharing and a share of local option sales tax revenue. As was the case with previous versions of the town, the new one would not levy property taxes and would rely on the sheriff’s office for law enforcement, he said.
Riley said the town would be the largest in the county to not have its own police department. The town, he said, will be comprised of just about one-tenth of the county’s population.
Eventually, Riley predicted, the town would need a property tax, because county residents elsewhere “over time are not going to allow their tax dollars to be spent for policing the town of James Island. The assertion that they will be able to function without a level of property taxes is not founded in any form of reality,” Riley said.
Riley said Charleston County Council members, who represent single-member districts, will face pressure from their voters to reduce expenses via changes to policing the town of James Island. Voters in North Charleston, Mount Pleasant and elsewhere will ask “Why am I subsidizing police in James Island,” Riley said.
Cannon, whose deputies already patrol the unincorporated area that could become the new town, said it’s economic good sense for the sheriff’s office to continue services there.
Already too many local law enforcement agencies provide too much duplication of services, and many small towns that formed their own police departments now regret it, Cannon asserted.
In a densely populated, mobile community, it makes sense to consolidate services, he said. “Times have changed, and we are dealing with a modern problem that has an archaic structure,” Cannon said.
Concerning subsidizing, Cannon said, the county already does plenty of that through library branches, the use of the Cannon Detention Center, EMS and other services. He cited the county’s consolidation of EMS in 1973 as an example of how an emergency service can be made more effective and more efficient.
Cannon questioned whether County Council could legally order his sheriff’s office to cease serving a town of James Island. “That’s an issue for the lawyers to figure out,” he said.
Noting he is elected county-wide, “I don’t think they (council) can dictate to an elected, constitutional officer how he performs his duties,” Cannon said.

Comments { }
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.