Cruise ship opponents turn out for cruise ship terminal hearing in North Charleston

  • Posted: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 8:23 p.m.
  • Text size: A A A
This undated photograph, taken before cargo operations were moved from Union Pier in 2011, show the location of the current and proposed cruise ship passenger terminals Buy this photo

Cruise ship opponents came out in numbers tonight to restate their grievances at a state hearing related to the new cruise ship terminal planned on Union Pier.

The hearing in North Charleston dealt with a permit the State Ports Authority needs to add five pilings beneath the pier to support the weight of elevators and escalators in the $35 million terminal.

Opponents, including Coastal Conservation League Director Dana Beach, said the state must consider all the impacts of the terminal the pilings would facilitate.

The terminal is planned in an existing warehouse building near Laurens Street. Residents of the nearby Ansonborough neighborhood were particularly vocal in their opposition.

Supporters of the planned terminal, including Mayor Joe Riley, said it would reduce the impacts of the existing cruise business. Cruise ships currently dock on Union Pier, at a 1970s-era terminal near Market Street.

There is no deadline for a decision on the permit from the Office of Coastal Resource Management.

Read more in tomorrow’s Post and Courier.

Comments { }

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.